BenchmarkNCVTools
BenchmarkNCVTools evaluates and compares non-coding variant scoring methods to benchmark their ability to distinguish pathogenic from benign variants in non-coding genomic regions.
Key Features:
- Comparative Analysis: Compares non-coding variant scoring tools including CADD, FATHMM-MKL, Funseq2, GWAVA, DANN, SNP, and SOM scores.
- Benchmarking Against Databases: Benchmarks scoring methods using ClinVar, COSMIC, and the 1000 Genomes Project to assess discrimination between pathogenic and benign variants.
- Performance Insights: Reports that CADD excels in detecting pathogenic variants within protein-coding gene regions using the ClinVar benchmark, while FATHMM-MKL, GWAVA, and SOMliver show superior performance for variants in lincRNAs, pseudogenes, and other non-coding regions when assessed with COSMIC.
- Precision Challenges: Identifies low precision across evaluated methods, indicating the need for additional non-coding genomic features to improve performance.
Scientific Applications:
- Pathogenic variant prioritization: Supports prioritization of pathogenic variants outside coding sequences by comparing deleteriousness scores for non-coding regions.
- Tool selection for non-coding studies: Provides comparative evidence to guide selection of scoring methods for studies of lincRNAs, pseudogenes, other non-coding regions, and protein-coding proximal variants.
Methodology:
Analyses are implemented as Snakemake workflows using C++ and R on Linux systems to ensure efficient and reproducible evaluation.
Topics
Details
- Tool Type:
- command-line tool
- Operating Systems:
- Linux
- Programming Languages:
- R, Shell, C++, Python
- Added:
- 6/28/2018
- Last Updated:
- 11/25/2024
Operations
Publications
Drubay D, Gautheret D, Michiels S. A benchmark study of scoring methods for non-coding mutations. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(10):1635-1641. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty008. PMID:29340599.
PMID: 29340599