In silico fragmentation evaluation

In silico fragmentation evaluation evaluates in silico MS/MS fragmentation algorithms by comparing theoretical fragmentations from candidate structures to experimental tandem mass spectra to improve compound identification in untargeted metabolomics.


Key Features:

  • Comparative Analysis: Evaluates the performance of publicly available in silico fragmentation algorithms, including MetFragCL, CFM-ID, MAGMa+, and MS-FINDER.
  • Optimization Strategies: Optimizes metadata usage, weighting factors, and combinations of methodologies to enhance identification accuracy.
  • Integration of Tools: Integrates outcomes from multiple tools—specifically MAGMa+ and CFM-ID—and incorporates compound importance information alongside MS/MS matching.
  • Performance Metrics: The combined approach achieved a 93% success rate for training data and 87% for challenge data in the 2016 CASMI challenge, versus 60% correct hits using MS/MS libraries alone.

Scientific Applications:

  • Metabolomics: Improves compound identification rates in untargeted metabolomics to facilitate analysis of metabolic pathways and mechanisms.
  • Biomarker Discovery: Enables more accurate identification of unknown compounds that may serve as biomarkers of biological states or diseases.
  • Pharmacology: Provides fragmentation information for novel compounds to support structural characterization in drug discovery.

Methodology:

The method generates theoretical MS/MS fragmentations from target structures and compares them to experimental tandem mass spectra, leverages multiple in silico fragmentation algorithms (MetFragCL, CFM-ID, MAGMa+, MS-FINDER), and applies metadata weighting and compound-importance information to refine identifications.

Topics

Details

Tool Type:
command-line tool
Operating Systems:
Linux, Windows, Mac
Programming Languages:
Java
Added:
8/29/2018
Last Updated:
11/25/2024

Operations

Data Inputs & Outputs

Publications

Blaženović I, Kind T, Torbašinović H, Obrenović S, Mehta SS, Tsugawa H, Wermuth T, Schauer N, Jahn M, Biedendieck R, Jahn D, Fiehn O. Comprehensive comparison of in silico MS/MS fragmentation tools of the CASMI contest: database boosting is needed to achieve 93% accuracy. Journal of Cheminformatics. 2017;9(1). doi:10.1186/s13321-017-0219-x. PMID:29086039. PMCID:PMC5445034.

PMID: 29086039
PMCID: PMC5445034
Funding: - National Institutes of Health: P20 HL113452, R01 HL091357, U24 DK097154 - National Science Foundation: MCB 1139644 - American Heart Association: 15SDG25760020