In silico fragmentation evaluation
In silico fragmentation evaluation evaluates in silico MS/MS fragmentation algorithms by comparing theoretical fragmentations from candidate structures to experimental tandem mass spectra to improve compound identification in untargeted metabolomics.
Key Features:
- Comparative Analysis: Evaluates the performance of publicly available in silico fragmentation algorithms, including MetFragCL, CFM-ID, MAGMa+, and MS-FINDER.
- Optimization Strategies: Optimizes metadata usage, weighting factors, and combinations of methodologies to enhance identification accuracy.
- Integration of Tools: Integrates outcomes from multiple tools—specifically MAGMa+ and CFM-ID—and incorporates compound importance information alongside MS/MS matching.
- Performance Metrics: The combined approach achieved a 93% success rate for training data and 87% for challenge data in the 2016 CASMI challenge, versus 60% correct hits using MS/MS libraries alone.
Scientific Applications:
- Metabolomics: Improves compound identification rates in untargeted metabolomics to facilitate analysis of metabolic pathways and mechanisms.
- Biomarker Discovery: Enables more accurate identification of unknown compounds that may serve as biomarkers of biological states or diseases.
- Pharmacology: Provides fragmentation information for novel compounds to support structural characterization in drug discovery.
Methodology:
The method generates theoretical MS/MS fragmentations from target structures and compares them to experimental tandem mass spectra, leverages multiple in silico fragmentation algorithms (MetFragCL, CFM-ID, MAGMa+, MS-FINDER), and applies metadata weighting and compound-importance information to refine identifications.
Topics
Details
- Tool Type:
- command-line tool
- Operating Systems:
- Linux, Windows, Mac
- Programming Languages:
- Java
- Added:
- 8/29/2018
- Last Updated:
- 11/25/2024
Operations
Data Inputs & Outputs
Service invocation
Publications
Blaženović I, Kind T, Torbašinović H, Obrenović S, Mehta SS, Tsugawa H, Wermuth T, Schauer N, Jahn M, Biedendieck R, Jahn D, Fiehn O. Comprehensive comparison of in silico MS/MS fragmentation tools of the CASMI contest: database boosting is needed to achieve 93% accuracy. Journal of Cheminformatics. 2017;9(1). doi:10.1186/s13321-017-0219-x. PMID:29086039. PMCID:PMC5445034.